To quote any available teenage girl "I hate DRAMA!". However, also like any available teenage girl, I am involved in the drama and here I go spreading my version of it all over the web!
I am not opposed to testing at all. That is how the world operates and we need to prepare our students to be participants in this reality. Jobs interviews often include some sort of aptitude test. There are tests to get into graduate level schooling. Tests for entry into the military, Tests for doctors, lawyers, teachers etc. to ensure that the professional has the knowledge required to practice in their field. Tests to get your driver's license. Testing is not a bad thing in and of itself. So what makes Standardized Testing so controversial?
I think it comes down to the cost/benefit analysis of Standardized Testing. Has anyone ever completed a real cost/benefit analysis of this system? Probably not, is my thought. Has the cost of the test produced enough benefit to justify it's existence? Does a standardized test fairly evaluate students who come to us with very un-standardized backgrounds? Where is the data that justifies this enormous cost?
While the Office of Education will probably quote you statistics that show how tests scores have risen over the years (I've seen these very stats), does that take into account our changing global economy? Are tests that test things such as spelling (thank you "SpellCheck") and literary response (objective and personal) really preparing our students for the future? Are our students more prepared, thanks to standardized testing, to compete with students in Japan, China, Finland and other countries? While these are great skills to have, are they really the most important things our students need for future success? I would say NO!
What kinds of skills are the best predictors of future success then? I would propose that the skills that truly can determine a person's future success are non-quantifiable. Skills such as determination, friendliness, perseverance, ability to think outside of the box, non-conformity, and self confidence. How much time do we as educators, however, spend on developing these traits? How much time are we even allowed to think such thoughts? Alas, these skills cannot be bubbled in and run through a computer for evaluation, therefore, they are not stressed.
Now let's get into the inequity of the tests. How many of us understand the varying backgrounds that our students are coming to school with? Economic difficulties, family drama, and let's face it.....parental apathy in many cases. I have found that parental involvement (proper parental involvement) is one of the strongest motivators for students. Parents who are uninvolved in their child's school and school work are sending a very powerful message to their children. "It doesn't really matter". These parents are also denying their children some of the world's best lessons. "Hard work pays off!", "Not everything is easy, but it's worth it", "You decide your future by the investments you make today", "Life is not always fair", "Discipline develops character" etc..etc. etc... I could go on and on!
But who gets judged on the outcomes of the test? Are parents held accountable at all? Never! That would be political suicide. No.... let's blame the educators and administrators. Let's tear down their self-confidence and pile on more testing. Let's put their jobs on the line, thereby creating more incentive for cheating. Let's take away creativity in the curriculum and focus only on Language Arts and Math. Let's make school more and more unpleasant everyday until those Damn Test Scores go up each and every year! Let's make teaching a systematic routine and take away personality and creativity. Let's allow parents to criticize and judge teacher performance because we are too afraid of a lawsuit. Let's allow bad teachers to remain because again, we are too afraid of a lawsuit.
I know I've listed many of the "costs" of standardized testing. So what are the benefits? Well I guess I would say that at least it does test every student on the same content based on the same standards. We should all be more knowledgeable of the standards that we are required to teach. How do we teach them effectively though? How do we create more benefit?
I would propose that we cut the Standardized testing in half. Only test every two years and use the money saved to provide QUALITY professional development. Let's get our teachers up to date on the latest technologies and strategies available. Let's build up our teachers. Let's support our teachers and hold our students and parents more accountable. Let's strengthen the foundation of education rather than building more wings and additions onto the already crumbling foundation.
'I imagine a school system that recognizes learning is natural, that a love of learning is normal, and that real learning is passionate learning. A school curriculum that values questions above answers…creativity above fact regurgitation…individuality above conformity.. and excellence above standardized performance….. And we must reject all notions of 'reform' that serve up more of the same: more testing, more 'standards', more uniformity, more conformity, more bureaucracy. Tom Peters Author 'Re-imagine'
Now.....open your test booklet to page 1. Make sure you have a number 2 pencil.. You have 25 minutes to complete.....Go!